In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" Donald Trump claims that Colorado state district court in case "Anders vs Griswold" missed the statutory procedural deadlines

Claim

Name

Types

Claim

Broader claims

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" Donald Trump claims that in "Anderson vs Griswold" case Colorado Supreme Court violated the Colorado Electors clause not adhering the statutes governing presidential elections

Opposing arguments

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that Supreme Court of Colorado in "Anderson v Griswold" missed statutory deadlines for hearing to be held because Trump himself asked the hearing to be held after the deadline or agreed to waive the deadline

Quotes that support the claim

Second, the state district court flouted the statutory deadlines in section 1-4-1204(4), which require a hearing to be held “[n]o later than five days after the challenge is filed,” and require findings of fact and conclusions of law to issue “no later than forty-eight hours after the hearing.”

Referenced by

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" Donald Trump claims that in "Anderson vs Griswold" case Colorado Supreme Court violated the Colorado Electors clause not adhering the statutes governing presidential elections

US Politics

Claim

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that Supreme Court of Colorado in "Anderson v Griswold" missed statutory deadlines for hearing to be held because Trump himself asked the hearing to be held after the deadline or agreed to waive the deadline

US Politics

Claim

Second, the state district court flouted the statutory deadlines in section 1-4-1204(4), which require a hearing to be held “[n]o later than five days after the challenge is filed,” and require findings of fact and conclusions of law to issue “no later than forty-eight hours after the hearing.”

US Politics

Quote