Default governance structure could be completely permissionless to participate

Claim

Name

Default governance structure could be completely permissionless to participate

Types

Opposing arguments

If there isn’t a regular review period for editors, there might be less motivation for editors to be active and competent

If there aren’t clearly stated expectations for editors it might be hard to determine which editors have the most merits

Sources

Default Governance Structure for Web3 Communities

Tags

Topics

Default governance for public spaces

Referenced by

Anyone in the Space can propose removing editors and members

Philosophy

There could be certain minimum thresholds for creating new Spaces

Philosophy

If some people aren’t accepted as members the space might be seen as exclusionary

Philosophy