In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that Trump did not rise Electors Clause issue in State courts in "Anderson v Griswold" case as he should have before raising it in the Supreme Court

  • Claim


Name

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that Trump did not rise Electors Clause issue in State courts in "Anderson v Griswold" case as he should have before raising it in the Supreme Court

Types

Claim

Broader claims

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that US Supreme Court should not review Trump’s claim that Colorado Supreme Court’s in "Anderson v Griswold" ruling somehow violated the Electors Clause

Quotes that support the claim

This Court “has almost unfailingly refused to consider any federal-law challenge to a state-court decision unless the federal claim ‘was either addressed by or properly presented to the state court that rendered the decision [it] ha[s] been asked to review
Trump never raised the Electors Clause issue until filing his Petition here. He never mentioned it in his briefs before the Colorado Supreme Court, even though he had every reason to raise it there
Trump cannot point to any place in the record where he preserved this argument as required by Supreme Court Rule 14(g)(i). See generally Pet. 18 n.30

Referenced by

Trump cannot point to any place in the record where he preserved this argument as required by Supreme Court Rule 14(g)(i). See generally Pet. 18 n.30

US Politics

Quote

Trump never raised the Electors Clause issue until filing his Petition here. He never mentioned it in his briefs before the Colorado Supreme Court, even though he had every reason to raise it there

US Politics

Quote

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that US Supreme Court should not review Trump’s claim that Colorado Supreme Court’s in "Anderson v Griswold" ruling somehow violated the Electors Clause

US Politics

Claim