In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that US Supreme Court should not review Trump’s claim that Colorado Supreme Court’s in "Anderson v Griswold" ruling somehow violated the Electors Clause

  • Claim


Name

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that US Supreme Court should not review Trump’s claim that Colorado Supreme Court’s in "Anderson v Griswold" ruling somehow violated the Electors Clause

Types

Claim

Opposing arguments

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" Donald Trump claims that in "Anderson vs Griswold" case Colorado Supreme Court violated the Colorado Electors clause not adhering the statutes governing presidential elections

Quotes that support the claim

The Court should not review Trump’s claim that the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling somehow violated the Electors Clause under Moore

Supporting arguments

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that Trump did not rise Electors Clause issue in State courts in "Anderson v Griswold" case as he should have before raising it in the Supreme Court
In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that including Donald Trump on the ballot would be a "wrongful act" by the Secretary of State as Donald Trump does not qualify
In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that Supreme Court of Colorado in "Anderson v Griswold" missed statutory deadlines for hearing to be held because Trump himself asked the hearing to be held after the deadline or agreed to waive the deadline

Topics

Response by responded Norma Anderson, et al. to the Donald Trump Appeal in the Supreme Court case "Trump v Anderson"

Referenced by

The Court should not review Trump’s claim that the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling somehow violated the Electors Clause under Moore

US Politics

Quote

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et. al claims that there is a requirement in Colorado Electors code for every candidate to be qualified

US Politics

Claim

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that including Donald Trump on the ballot would be a "wrongful act" by the Secretary of State as Donald Trump does not qualify

US Politics

Claim