In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that no courts, except Colorado, have addressed the political question doctrine, therefore did not rule that question is nonjusticiable

  • Claim


Name

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that no courts, except Colorado, have addressed the political question doctrine, therefore did not rule that question is nonjusticiable

Types

Claim

Broader claims

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims states have the right to resolve questions concerning a US presidential candidate’s eligibility not only the Congress

Opposing arguments

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" Donald Trump claims that every court except Colorado that has addressed the political question doctrine when presented with the question of determining President Trump’s eligibility for Presidency has held that question is nonjusticiable and reserved to US Congress

Quotes that support the claim

Trump falsely states that “every court except Colorado” that has addressed Section 3 challenges against him “has held that question is nonjusticiable and reserved to Congress.” Pet. 20. In reality, other than the decision below, no appellate court has addressed the question and two have expressly declined to reach it.

Referenced by

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims states have the right to resolve questions concerning a US presidential candidate’s eligibility not only the Congress

US Politics

Claim

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" Donald Trump claims that every court except Colorado that has addressed the political question doctrine when presented with the question of determining President Trump’s eligibility for Presidency has held that question is nonjusticiable and reserved to US Congress

US Politics

Claim

Trump falsely states that “every court except Colorado” that has addressed Section 3 challenges against him “has held that question is nonjusticiable and reserved to Congress.” Pet. 20. In reality, other than the decision below, no appellate court has addressed the question and two have expressly declined to reach it.

US Politics

Quote