In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims states have the right to resolve questions concerning a US presidential candidate’s eligibility not only the Congress

  • Claim


Name

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims states have the right to resolve questions concerning a US presidential candidate’s eligibility not only the Congress

Types

Claim

Opposing arguments

US Supreme Court in "Trump v Anderson" ruled that responsibility for enforcing Section 3 of 14th Amendment of US Constitution against federal office holders and candidates rests with Congress and not the States
In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" Donald Trump claims that US Congress is the proper body to resolve questions concerning a US presidential candidate’s eligibility not a state court

Supporting arguments

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that no courts, except Colorado, have addressed the political question doctrine, therefore did not rule that question is nonjusticiable
In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that candidate qualification for holding the office of US President must be determined before elections, therefore qualification must be done by State
In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that US Constitution grants state legislatures near plenary authority to “direct” the “manner” of appointing presidential electors
In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that decision if someone "has engaged in insurrection" under Section 3 of 14th amendment of US constitution lies within judicial branch of government

Topics

Response by responded Norma Anderson, et al. to the Donald Trump Appeal in the Supreme Court case "Trump v Anderson"

Referenced by

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" Donald Trump claims that US Congress is the proper body to resolve questions concerning a US presidential candidate’s eligibility not a state court

US Politics

Claim

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that US Constitution grants state legislatures near plenary authority to “direct” the “manner” of appointing presidential electors

US Politics

Claim

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that no courts, except Colorado, have addressed the political question doctrine, therefore did not rule that question is nonjusticiable

US Politics

Claim