Given the varied and rugged terrain along the US-MX border, a continuous wall does not effectively stop illegal immigration or smuggling, as people can find alternative methods to bypass it

  • Voting position claim
  • Claim

Name

Given the varied and rugged terrain along the US-MX border, a continuous wall does not effectively stop illegal immigration or smuggling, as people can find alternative methods to bypass it

Types

Voting position claim
Claim

Opposed voting positions

Build a large-scale wall along the US-MX border

Opposing arguments

Areas with constructed border walls have seen dramatic drops in attempted illegal border crossings, providing real-world evidence of their effectiveness in controlling immigration.

Supporting arguments

Evidence shows that current fencing can be easily breached and tunnels are frequently discovered, questioning the effectiveness of a physical barrier.

Voting issues

US-Mexico border management

Referenced by

Build a large-scale wall along the US-MX border

US Politics

Voting position

Evidence shows that current fencing can be easily breached and tunnels are frequently discovered, questioning the effectiveness of a physical barrier.

US Politics

Voting position claim
Claim