In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that Colorado Supreme court's holding in case "Anderson v. Griswold" that Donald Trump did "engage in insurrection" should not be questioned, but only evaluated if it qualifies for Section 3 of 14th Amendment of US Constitution

  • Claim


Name

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that Colorado Supreme court's holding in case "Anderson v. Griswold" that Donald Trump did "engage in insurrection" should not be questioned, but only evaluated if it qualifies for Section 3 of 14th Amendment of US Constitution

Types

Claim

Opposing arguments

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" Donald Trump claims that US Supreme Court should reverse Colorado Supreme court holding that he did "engage in insurrection"

Supporting arguments

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that based on “clear and convincing evidence” Colorado trial court in case "Anderson v Griswold" has already found that Trump was the “factual cause” of the insurrection on January 6, 2021
In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that Colorado Supreme court's case "Anderson v Griswold" factual finding are entitled to substantial deference, but Trump’s petition to the Supreme Court does not offer any plausible basis for overturning it.

Topics

Response by responded Norma Anderson, et al. to the Donald Trump Appeal in the Supreme Court case "Trump v Anderson"

Referenced by

Court should not take up any issues (like question 6) that would require the Court to re-weigh the facts found by the state trial court

US Politics

Quote

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" Donald Trump claims that US Supreme Court should reverse Colorado Supreme court holding that he did "engage in insurrection"

US Politics

Claim

Instead of re-weighing facts, the Court should limit its review to whether the facts found by the trial court satisfy the legal standard for engaging in insurrection under Section 3.

US Politics

Quote