In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that Colorado Supreme court's case "Anderson v Griswold" factual finding are entitled to substantial deference, but Trump’s petition to the Supreme Court does not offer any plausible basis for overturning it.
Referenced by
In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that Colorado Supreme court's holding in case "Anderson v. Griswold" that Donald Trump did "engage in insurrection" should not be questioned, but only evaluated if it qualifies for Section 3 of 14th Amendment of US Constitution
US Politics
Claim
Based on the totality of the evidence and its weighing of witness credibility, the trial court found by “clear and convincing evidence” that Trump was the “factual cause” of the insurrection on January 6, 2021, having intentionally incited the mob to violence in a desperate ploy to cling to power. That factual finding is entitled to substantial deference, and Trump’s petition does not offer any plausible basis for overturning it
US Politics
Quote