In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" Respondent's Anderson et al. claims that Donald Trump conflates at least 7 different questions to be resolved by Supreme Court into one
Referenced by
In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" Respondent's Anderson et al. claims that Supreme Court should accept Donald Trump appeal in Colorado State Supreme Court ruling in "Anderson v Griswold" for review on some issues only and deny on others
US Politics
Claim
Petitioner Donald J. Trump offers a single question presented, which wrongly conflates at least seven discrete legal and factual issues in his Petition. Properly framed, the questions presented are: 1. Whether a challenge to the constitutional qualifications of a candidate for President presents a non-justiciable political question? 2. Whether the Presidency and the President fall within the list of offices and officers to which Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment applies? 3. Whether states may exclude from the ballot candidates who are ineligible to hold office under Section 3? 4. Whether Congress must first pass legislation under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment before a state can enforce Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, even if state law provides a cause of action to enforce it? 5. Whether, by intentionally mobilizing, inciting, and encouraging the violent attack on the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021, Trump “engaged in insurrection” against the Constitution for purposes of Section 3?
US Politics
Quote