In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" Respondent's Anderson et al. claims that Supreme Court should accept Donald Trump appeal in Colorado State Supreme Court ruling in "Anderson v Griswold" for review on some issues only and deny on others

  • Claim


Name

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" Respondent's Anderson et al. claims that Supreme Court should accept Donald Trump appeal in Colorado State Supreme Court ruling in "Anderson v Griswold" for review on some issues only and deny on others

Types

Claim

Opposing arguments

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" Donald Trump claims that issues presented are of exceptional importance and urgently require this court's prompt resolution

Quotes that support the claim

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" Respondent's Anderson et al. claims that Supreme Court should accept Donald Trump appeal in Colorado State Supreme Court ruling in "Anderson v Griswold" for review on some issues only and deny on others
That said, the Court should not take up any issues (like question 6) that would require the Court to re-weigh the facts found by the state trial court
Additionally, the Court should decline Trump’s invitation to second-guess the Colorado Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Colorado Election Code.
The Anderson Respondents agree the Court should grant certiorari on questions about the legal interpretation of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment (questions 2–5 as framed above) and on related justiciability issues (question 1 as framed above). Although the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision on each of these issues was correct, these are important issues of first impression that this Court should resolve. That said, the Court should not take up any issues (like question 6) that would require the Court to re-weigh the facts found by the state trial court.

Supporting arguments

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" Respondent's Anderson et al. claims that Donald Trump conflates at least 7 different questions to be resolved by Supreme Court into one

Topics

Response by responded Norma Anderson, et al. to the Donald Trump Appeal in the Supreme Court case "Trump v Anderson"

Referenced by

Additionally, the Court should decline Trump’s invitation to second-guess the Colorado Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Colorado Election Code.

US Politics

Quote

That said, the Court should not take up any issues (like question 6) that would require the Court to re-weigh the facts found by the state trial court

US Politics

Quote

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" Donald Trump claims that issues presented are of exceptional importance and urgently require this court's prompt resolution

US Politics

Claim