In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that decision if someone "has engaged in insurrection" under Section 3 of 14th amendment of US constitution lies within judicial branch of government

  • Claim


Name

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims that decision if someone "has engaged in insurrection" under Section 3 of 14th amendment of US constitution lies within judicial branch of government

Types

Claim

Broader claims

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" respondent Anderson et al. claims states have the right to resolve questions concerning a US presidential candidate’s eligibility not only the Congress

Opposing arguments

In Supreme Court case "Anderson v Trump" Donald Trump claims that state courts lack judicially manageable standards for resolving disputes over US presidential disqualifications

Quotes that support the claim

Nor is there anything about the concept of “engaging in insurrection” that eludes judicially discoverable and manageable standards. Interpreting and applying such provisions is precisely what courts do. Pet. App. 109a–113a. That concept is far less elusive than “due process” and “equal protection,” Fourteenth Amendment standards courts grapple with all the time.